RE: Feds reading this list, Jim Bell, and threats

paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk pissed off Hallam-Baker to the extent that gave up all pretense hiding his support for a New World Order, and wrote:
Yeah, like I wrote in "The Laird of the new world order". ... They said they worked for freedom but they had another plan. The only new world order is, obey your Uncle Sam. Must be in deep, deep cover.
I have degrees in Nuclear Physics, Electronic Engineering, I have been offered a contract for my book on the philosophy of communication.
...so the rest of us are just dirt under your feet?
I was pointing out that the attempt to claim that the rest of us poor slobs didn't see Jim Bell as a shining Messiah was not because we were too stupid to understand him as claimed.
I don't believe that people are fit judges of their own cause as Bell and you do.
So we should only fight for other people's causes, and not our own? Or not fight at all?
I think that before you murder someone because you think they are wrong you need to at the very least put the matter to an impartial arbitrator. Phill

Do you believe such a system exists here? Anywhere? bd On Fri, 4 Apr 1997, Phillip M. Hallam-Baker wrote:
I think that before you murder someone because you think they are wrong you need to at the very least put the matter to an impartial arbitrator.
Phill
participants (2)
-
Brad Dolan
-
Phillip M. Hallam-Baker