Re: NSA Lawyers Believe ITARs Would be Overturned if Tested in Court
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b69e/7b69e70bfad096462dc8c51eaee08d85f74a5fb4" alt=""
At 02:25 AM 7/22/96 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote:
(Not all of them, presumably. Shipment of hardware ("arms") would likely not be affected. But the ITARs that stop the spread of knowledge, published papers, and speech (such as speaking where a foreigner can hear!) would likely be overturned.) --Tim May
Which raises an interesting question: Why aren't they (still) restricting PC-type computers for export? While it might not appear to make a great deal of sense either, a PC is just as much a tool for encryption as the software which runs on it. And it's obvious that given the two scenarios below: 1. You have a $1000 computer and no (freebie) software yet. or 2. You have freebie software and no $1000 computer. You're closer ($) to being able to do encryption with the former set of equipment. And, of course, nobody's under the illusion that the government can keep the software bottled up, but they'd at least have a prayer keeping most 486 and Pentium-based computers from being exported. I don't mean to give the idiots any ideas, and it's too late anyway, but... Jim Bell jimbell@pacifier.com
participants (1)
-
jim bell