Re: Imprisoned for Not Having a Gun?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1c00/e1c0081a9d3cb5bddef710e26d33aac835e9ab17" alt=""
At 6:57 AM 8/9/96, The Deviant wrote:
I agree with you. I don't have anything against guns, but either requiring them or disallowing them is just plain dumb. It should be noted that the Supreme Court's interpretaion of "Congress shall make no law" is basicly "no lawmaking body that holds any jurisdiction shall make no law"...
On this last point, I used to think so, too. However, one of the law professors on one of these lists gave various examples purporting to show that this is not so, that local jurisdictions can and do pass laws which Congress is not permitted to pass. If they read this, they can comment. --Tim Boycott "Big Brother Inside" software! We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed. ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Licensed Ontologist | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
participants (1)
-
tcmay@got.net