Regarding employee rights on company equipment

A day or so ago, I reasoned incorrectly that university students and employees were free to encrypt mail they sent through their student or work accounts. This was in response to a statement that the govt could retain at least some control of internet traffic through the universities and businesses. I would credit the person who called me on it, by I do not remember who it was. It seems that, at least for employees, it is totally up to the employer:
From Edupage Feb 8, 1996,
INTERNET USAGE POLICIES Neal J. Friedman, a specialist in online computer law, says that "employees are under the misapprehension that the First Amendment applies in the workplace -- it doesn't. Employees need to know they have no right of privacy and no right of free speech using company resources." According to Computerworld, a number of employers are adopting Internet usage polcies, such as one developed at Florida Atlantic University: < http://www.fau.edu/rinaldi/net/netpol.txt > (Computerworld 5 Feb 96 p55) It's still to bad that I was wrong :-(, but such is life. lunaslide On the meridian of time there is no injustice, only the poetry of motion creating the illusion of truth and drama. Henry Miller ________________________________________________________________ Digitally sign your mail too! -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQCPAzEX3QEAAAEEAOGQjhnqGH29pO1WDaXs5GFOVPhCBWyYEk9XEwRmscjveWzH AhA6DeOA480zWNqQURyqE2yPmR8WzT+OXYqmeiQiycKyFA41Vs/Ruf+gXXxe7uXS L5BK3K8oKbfoH0D5/TAkMT4r6BprXFQz4pFc3gY2SSaSPElpMjKHaKBsRsyRABEB AAG0HUplZmYgQ29ubiA8bHVuYXNsaWRlQGxvb3AuY29tiQCVAwUQMRffHzKHaKBs RsyRAQGNhwP9E9xEZ9/LCKnhgtnrqgD7pDoXG2pCy8FoyfFjoImGkG+jF1wELXmB Z0mf8F8CgYkys0mif1XeGDMelr1gzlZAm6LgQt4kcvztMW/aRLn18QP+iwltVT/L p8D37mitOjvuk46sWgAChIaPPPIeg/EaYQjQkmlpWKsEYIoTRy+E8mU= =4Gku -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

On Fri, 9 Feb 1996 lunaslide@loop.com wrote: [There are none]
It's still to bad that I was wrong :-(, but such is life.
I don't see why that's such a big deal, now. How much does a netcom or c2.org account cost anyway? If you want to claim the right to use other people's equipment for personal purposes, then you're accepting that they will do the same thing. I don't think you want your CEO to have an endless array of perks, or your political representatives to abuse government resources for personal and political use (which is not to say that they don't, just that they shouldn't, and you shouldn't legitimize it). -rich
participants (2)
-
lunaslide@loop.com
-
Rich Graves