Rejected posting to CYBERIA-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
You are not authorized to send mail to the CYBERIA-L list from your cypherpunks@TOAD.COM account. You might be authorized to send to the list from another of your accounts, or perhaps when using another mail program which generates slightly different addresses, but LISTSERV has no way to associate this other account or address with yours. If you need assistance or if you have any question regarding the policy of the CYBERIA-L list, please contact the list owners: CYBERIA-L-request@LISTSERV.AOL.COM. ------------------------ Rejected message (36 lines) -------------------------- Received: from netcomsv.netcom.com (uucp1-b.netcom.com [163.179.3.1]) by listserv.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA20089 for <CYBERIA-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM>; Tue, 19 May 1998 11:05:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ca07b8bl (pax-ca14-19.ix.netcom.com [204.31.233.83]) by netcomsv.netcom.com (8.8.5-r-beta/8.8.5/(NETCOM v1.01)) with SMTP id IAA23186; Tue, 19 May 1998 08:05:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980518104054.008bd710@popd.ix.netcom.com> X-Sender: stewarts@popd.ix.netcom.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 10:40:54 -0700 To: Law & Policy of Computer Communications <CYBERIA-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM>, CYBERIA-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM From: Bill Stewart <cypherpunks@toad.com> Subject: Re: regulating speech (was: DNS) In-Reply-To: <3.0.16.19980515115128.34271d5c@pop.radix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 12:41 PM 5/15/98 -0400, Donald Weightman wrote:
I wonder if LEBRON V. AMTRAK is relevant here. There the Court extended the First Amendment to corporations created by, and under the control of, the government in the case of an artist who argued successfully that Amtrak had been wrong to reject his billboard display because of its political message.
The devil is in the details -- of InterNIC's creation and operation, vs. Amtrak's.
The Supreme Court just decided that Tax-funded radio/tv stations don't have to include all candidates for an office in their debates if they don't feel like it, based on First Amendment reasons. Thanks! Bill Bill Stewart, bill.stewart@pobox.com PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF 3C85 B884 0ABE 4639
participants (1)
-
L-Soft list server at America Online (1.8c)