-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We have batted this around and around ... I am curious though what the more legal-oriented among us feel the current wording portends for us ... say it gets passed ... just what will be the legal status of the use of non-GAKked crypto? There is little question that steganography will be raised to a high art form under these proposals. That not withstanding, I would just like to get a feel for exactly where it leaves the current PGP et al. community? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBNBYbJsdZgC62U/gIEQKB+ACgplZ/gmiKJEQgM5syzV2u1ls1LpsAn3Th 7veoktJjakAcKVzXTi8m0L+9 =ws+o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Brian B. Riley --> http://www.macconnect.com/~brianbr For PGP Keys - Send Email Subject "Get PGP Key" "Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of his tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men." -- Ayn Rand - The Fountainhead (1943)