
At 1:38 PM 9/2/96, Dave Harman OBC wrote:
In California, it's a felony to merely *own* a Ninja star. It's a felony to carry a *concealed* knife, but carrying it openly in a holster is legal. It's a felony for most people to carry a concealed loaded handgun on the street only on a *second* offense. It'a a felony to merely *own* a switchblade, brass knuckles, etc. Do our weapons laws sound strange? Are many of our weapons laws stricter than countries like Sweden? Yes!
Most laws about knives, dirks, daggers, brass knuckles, saps, etc. were devised to control the coloreds, who could not afford the weapons of choice of whites and other gentlemen. Hence, a colored who gets picked up on some charge, or detained, can be jailed on a felony charge for having a pocketknife, or a sap, or brass knucks. Coloreds from Asia can be jailed for having the martial arts sorts of weapons. A white gets a misdemeanor charge for carrying a gun. (This analysis is not original with me. The gun magazines have noted the racist origins of misdemeanor/felony dichotomies for many years. One article I read a few years ago traced the precise times at which these laws came into being...mostly the times in various states corresponded with periods of high immigration of coloreds to major cities.) Here in California there's a bill pending in the legislature which would decriminalize the carrying of a pocketknife that can be opened with one hand (a la the Spyderco, Benchmade, Buck, Cold Steel, etc., knives with thumb holes or studs). Even though such knives are openly sold in every sporting goods store I have ever been in, and are carrried by a truly large fraction of the population, such knives are currently classified as "switchblades" and can be prosecuted as a felony. A good way to selectively harasss someone. Interestingly, it was the District Attorneys lobbying group in California which made the difference: they argued that such laws are unenforceable or are selectively enforced. --Tim May We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, I know that that ain't allowed. ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Licensed Ontologist | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."

! At 1:38 PM 9/2/96, Dave Harman OBC wrote: ! ! >In California, it's a felony to merely *own* a Ninja star. It's a ! >felony to carry a *concealed* knife, but carrying it openly in a ! >holster is legal. It's a felony for most people to carry a ! >concealed loaded handgun on the street only on a *second* offense. ! >It'a a felony to merely *own* a switchblade, brass knuckles, etc. ! >Do our weapons laws sound strange? Are many of our weapons laws ! >stricter than countries like Sweden? Yes! ! ! Most laws about knives, dirks, daggers, brass knuckles, saps, etc. were ! devised to control the coloreds, who could not afford the weapons of choice ! of whites and other gentlemen. ! ! Hence, a colored who gets picked up on some charge, or detained, can be ! jailed on a felony charge for having a pocketknife, or a sap, or brass ! knucks. Coloreds from Asia can be jailed for having the martial arts sorts ! of weapons. ! ! A white gets a misdemeanor charge for carrying a gun. Of course, whites never commit other crimes, are never on the proscribed categories, and people of colour never carry guns or are never free of being classified as being in the proscribed categories. You sound like Skippy making fun of the McClatchy newspapers. ! (This analysis is not original with me. The gun magazines have noted the ! racist origins of misdemeanor/felony dichotomies for many years. One ! article I read a few years ago traced the precise times at which these laws ! came into being...mostly the times in various states corresponded with ! periods of high immigration of coloreds to major cities.) ! ! Here in California there's a bill pending in the legislature which would ! decriminalize the carrying of a pocketknife that can be opened with one ! hand (a la the Spyderco, Benchmade, Buck, Cold Steel, etc., knives with ! thumb holes or studs). Even though such knives are openly sold in every ! sporting goods store I have ever been in, and are carrried by a truly large ! fraction of the population, such knives are currently classified as ! "switchblades" and can be prosecuted as a felony. A good way to selectively What? Are you talking about lockbacks? An actual switchblade is a felony to *possess* in California. ! harasss someone. Interestingly, it was the District Attorneys lobbying I'm familiar with the anti-racist pandering of the gun rights majority. The weapons mentioned above were banned later this century in California, ostensibly to protect minors. There has always been cheap firearms available to poor people in America, I'm not aware that only coloured people can be poor! It's been a step by step process to take away rights, it's been entirely irrelevent what the laws were supposedly for. It is not believable that all whites are rich or that poor whites in prison are treated with greater respect than rich people of colour or poor people of colour. There's been *both* racist and anti-racist elements to the progress of unjust laws, the original intent of the law itself is forgotten if the current law only respects people of capital. </disjointed\ paragraph=stop/>
participants (2)
-
qut@netcom.com
-
tcmay@got.net