GFSR initialization? [Re: National Atomic Museum]

17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
[Bill Payne's's mailing list pruned back to cypherpunks only]
Is that to speed it up, so you don't have to initialize it by spinning through a bunch of initial iterations? Turns out there's a time-memory tradeoff, where if you do a recursion relationship on where you want it to start, you can set it up in log2 time and come out with the same starting point you would have by spinning: the recursion equations cancel nicely and it boils down to something manageable. I think other people have initialized it with another PRNG with good success. I <know> that's not classified, since I came up with the recursion shortly after the Lewis & Payne paper on GFSR came out -- JACM, wasn't it? I never got around to writing it up. Jim Gillogly
7820
Age (days ago)
7820
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
jim@mentat.com