As one of ciphergroupies (call a spade a spade, the man said, and, frankly, I don't write code, much less cryto-code) I agree with Perry. While I understand that crypto isn't the only thing discussed on this list, it used be quite apparent to anyone who signed on to this list that strong crypto and its consequences was the the focus of the group. Some days it's very apparent that that is not the focus. My mail.torrent skills are pretty well advanced these days, because I sit on lots of mail groups. The first high volume one was cypherpunks, where I got my bones in such matters, and I've gotten pretty adept at thrashing the noise out of the way. However, it does seem that, like Tim said a while ago, we're getting a lot of forwards from other groups, which dilute the content here pretty significantly. I've done this myself. A lot. Not as much as I used to, but it still happens: I just forwarded here an announcement for a digital commerce conference in Texas, for instance. So, I have a few suggestions. First, we might try to be more considerate of the other's wetware, while developing our own, and try to limit our postings to this net to original contributions where possible, even if it's just a summary of something you've read. Write it in your own words, in other words ;-). I'm not saying rewrite instead of forward if the message is extremely crypto (or consequent) relevant, we get action messages from EPIC, for instance, which are mostly relevant (opinions of the efficacy of EPIC aside, of course). Second, if you have something which people here might be interested in, and it's vaguely tangental, post a pointer. The classic case here is someone, who shall remain nameless for reasons you'll see in a moment, who's brilliantly cryptic (!) pointers to his droid-fed article stash have been a very useful and pleasantly salient feature of the landscape here for more than a year now. You can point to an FTP file, a web page, have people ask for it in an e-mail reply from you, and if it's something er, professionally written, and want it handled er, gingerly, you can probably contact the above mentioned droid-master for his help in distributing your find. I just sent him such an article on dark fiber / frequency multiplexing which he pointed the group to within the last week. Not that you should choke the droid factory, mind you, but it can be done in a special circumstance. Perry seems pretty burned up, and he's burned up for the right reasons, not the least of which is that he's been busting his butt in a project which will encrypt the net at the very core: the TCP/IP layer itself. This is very very important, and people should pay attention to it, and help however they can. (It's also likely to make Perry insufferable -- deservedly -- pretty soon ;-)). Like everyone else, he subscribes to this group to learn more about crypto, and he's finding the crypto content dwindling, the "S1" discussion notwithstanding, and as someone who's invested a lot of time, energy, and emotions in this group, he doesn't sound happy about it. This is also compounded by the fact that while Perry is one of my favorite people here, Perry is also a grouch. I usually laugh when he goes over the top about something, because his polemics are some of the best I've ever seen. That doesn't make it any better if you're on the receiving end of such invective, and he's pissed off people who agree with him most of the rest of the time as a result. He's usually right, however, and he's a grownup, so I don't think he's going to change his tone anytime soon, and I've just learned to ignore his more inflamitory remarks as a cost of doing business with his not inconsiderable talents. That goes for several people around here, by the way, and it's a shame when they don't play well with others, but, like Perry, they're grownups. Another cost of doing business. So, in summary, point instead of forward where possible, particularly if it's not explicitly crypto or crypto consequent; a good immediate way to help the cause of crypto on the net is to bone up on this IPSP stuff and see what you can do to help, because it's very important; and Perry and other people here are grouches and can't seem to play nice with each other on occasion (So, what else is new? ;-)). Cheers, Bob Hettinga ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com) Shipwright Development Corporation, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA (617) 323-7923 "Reality is not optional." --Thomas Sowell
Phree Phil: Email: zldf@clark.net http://www.netresponse.com/zldf <<<<<
As one of ciphergroupies (call a spade a spade, the man said, and, frankly, I don't write code, much less cryto-code) I agree with Perry.
For anyone who is interested in writing code and other related activies I'm willing to redistribute the cypherpunks from my site via MailWeir so users can kill and prune what messages they read and which ones they don't. /hawk
participants (2)
-
Harry S. Hawk -
rah@shipwright.com