Re: Children and the Net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sun, 31 Jul 1994, Mike Duvos wrote:
Had it not been for the fact that having children covered with scars, welts, and bruises is not considered child abuse in the state of Texas, all the children would have been removed from the compound prior to the raid, and only the adults would have been toasted.
Puh-leeze! There has been little to no evidence of ANY abuse of the Branch Davidian children. The only thing we know is that Koresh liked his mates young but that doesn't mean the rest of hte children were abused and, of course, Koresh's kink is quite normal in quite a few places. Are you forgetting that the BDs were investigated for child abuse and cleared earlier?
These facts were well documented. Child welfare workers visited the compound and examined the children. Signs of previous physical punishment were noted as well as a room devoted to that purpose and ^^^^^^^^^^ the appropriate paraphernalia.
We were talking about physical ABUSE, not physical PUNISHMENT. There is a difference, unless of course you're one of those people that believe that they're one in the same and that parents shouldn't be allowed to physically discipline their children in any manner whatsoever. When I was a child, we had a room devoted to the physical discipline of us children: my parents bedroom. And in that room, specifially the closet, my father kept the appropriate paraphenalia: belts. Do you believe my parents should have been arrested for "child abuse"? I don't. The fact stands that there was no evidence that the children in the compound were ABUSED. The Texas department of child welfare cleared Koresh of all such charges. If you have any documentation to the contrary, I would certainly be interested in seeing it. I don't want to see evidence of PUNISHMENT, only ABUSE. Ken ============================================================================= Ken Kirksey kkirksey@world.std.com Mac Guru & Developer - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- "This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember it or overthrow it." - Abraham Lincoln -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQCVAgUBLj7FhusZNYlu+zuBAQGENgP/V6G/gCuFJ40+AeY0rs++AB73260q9jzk iLScYWfPwQ0JyMd3XJ9K4GW0eVaiV+LmWbAIFXj0FdBOVmzAnpFtw2zWTZep4UMO awrUFsp0UioGi3web3q2cfgxi3Z5YQiaZQN6rvpAeECsXyi+mutG8dQ8HdYgNY1N TRiTwsf+5pk= =86cK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Lately there has been much tedious back and forth concerning child abuse. This has very little to do with cryptography. It has however something to do with privacy. Should they government meddle in peoples homes and make sure they are bringing up children in the proper government approved fashion? Regarding child abuse and Koresh: The government was fishing for stuff to get him on. The Davidians were charged, came to court, and were aquitted. The infamous warrant that led to the Davidian children being crispy fried concerned guns, not child abuse. If we look at famous child abuse cases in California they are mostly cases of gross abuse by government. Do children get abused: Yep, almost always by step parents, as in the wicked stepmother. We are unsurprised when someone murders a rival. We take for granted that two women under one roof will lead to grave trouble. Yet a stepchild is a more formidable rival for a spouses attentions than any lover could be. In fact, step parents are more strongly motivated to murder step children than they are to murder their wife or husbands other lovers. For this reason the evil step parent has for centuries been a stock character to make the plot move along. Until recently anybody who read a book would take for granted that step parents were a hazard to life and limb. And when I talk to a kid who is hanging out a long way from home, a common reason is to avoid being alone with a step parent. Step parents are still a hazard to life and limb. Yet in todays literature and TV shows and movies, it is generally assumed that step parents and step children will get along tolerably well. For a reason that is very unclear to me, this obvious fact is being systematicly denied in Western culture generally, and in American culture in particular. To support this fiction, it appears to me that "Child Protective Services" agencies make a deliberate effort to go after natural parents. It appears to me that they are trying to make some kind of quota so as to create the appearance that child abuse is not biologically driven problem. Similarly, when a natural parent abuses their child, this receives vastly more media attention than step parent abuse, in a disproportion similar to the extreme disproportion given to incidents of white racial violence against blacks as compared to black racial violence against whites. Yep. Its a conspiracy. But what is the point of such a conspiracy?
participants (2)
-
jamesd＠netcom.com -
kkirksey＠world.std.com