Re: Scientology [!]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
1/15/95
TO: THOMAS M. SMALL COUNSEL FOR RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER AND BRIDGE PUBLICATIONS, INC.
FROM: Lance Cottrell Operator of remailer@nately and mixmaster@nately
My pgp says: Bad signature Does this message come from Lance Cottrell or from Scientology?
I am willing to comply with your request.
Oh. If this is true (is it?) and other remailer operators do the same, there will be no anonymous criticism of the Thetans any more. An non-anonymous criticism of this "church" is said to be a thing of a special kind. Mmmh, Hadmut
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Mon, 16 Jan, danisch@ira.uka.de (Hadmut Danisch) wrote:
FROM: Lance Cottrell Operator of remailer@nately and mixmaster@nately [...--aw] I am willing to comply with your request.
Oh. If this is true (is it?) and other remailer operators do the same, there will be no anonymous criticism of the Thetans any more.
I don't have the text of Lance's response available at the moment, but I believe he clearly stated that he would not block remailings to the mail-to-news gateways. I.e., while he's complying with the letter of the Co$ request, his remailers can still be used effectively for anonymous posting. Other than a slight delay in posting, I can't think of any inconvenience this imposes on those wishing to post anonymously. I thought it was an excellent response. /* nudge, wink, etc. :-) */ Alan Westrope <awestrop@nyx.cs.du.edu> __________/|-, <adwestro@ouray.denver.colorado.edu> (_) \|-' 2.6.2 public key: finger / servers PGP 0xB8359639: D6 89 74 03 77 C8 2D 43 7C CA 6D 57 29 25 69 23 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBLxqooVRRFMq4NZY5AQGZzQP9HMVer1sD3dTnY/VUYz3CVTeCR+5ICfcR kG60dHeP7s/qKBHTF1qTx1hUGExqnC6DOBnvkh6wjhohcfjyGrQiQtyyhRQX55NH FUtR3gjJH0lLxB4Qr1RI3mempuXL4H5G/aQoqz1rxHN2lGUFx3YBD+2zmAqPqFIZ KMgL0vx6kTc= =j7er -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (2)
-
adwestro＠ouray.Denver.Colorado.EDU -
danisch＠ira.uka.de