At 09:10 PM 1/25/95, Michael Handler wrote:

... I have literally hundreds of messages archived from the CP list of several months back where Eric Hughes repeatedly states that reordering, not latency, is the key. Reordering of a sufficient magnitude will introduce latency inherently. Otherwise you are still vulnerable to traffic analysis (which is an art, not a science, remember).

The headache with reordering of that sort is that you can't reply to a message until you've seen the message you're replying to. There's a certain level of ordering that can't be changed. --Paul J. Ste. Marie pstemari@well.sf.ca.us, pstemari@erinet.com