DCSB: The Internet Consumer -- 1996 in Review & Predictions for1997
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- The Digital Commerce Society of Boston Presents David Kaufman FIND/SVP Emerging Technologies Research Group "The Internet Consumer -- 1996 in Review & Predictions for 1997" Tuesday, February 4, 1997 12 - 2 PM The Downtown Harvard Club of Boston One Federal Street, Boston, MA David is Managing Director of FIND/SVP's Emerging Technologies Research Group with specific responsibility for "The Internet Consumer - Continuous Market Advisory Service". The group provides numerous Fortune 500 companies with detailed research and analysis on behaviors and preferences of Internet consumers. Mr. Kaufman will discuss the Internet as a consumer platform. The growth of the Internet has been getting a lot of press, most of it based on speculation, not research. Although good data is hard to find, it does exist and can be used to approach the Interactive consumer. During 1996 it became true that Internet consumers, who paid for their own access, were one of the fastest growing market segments. Currently, home and small business users are driving the demand for interactive services such as online banking and financial planning. Users also expressed an interest in locating information on such diverse topics as travel, entertainment, parenting, and health. Starting in 1997 consumers will be able to access the net from more numerous locations and in different ways. Internet appliances such as WebTV will allow non-technology users to access the net. As critical mass develops, the net will become impossible to ignore for most marketers. Based on research and some industry insight, Mr. Kaufman will present FIND/SVP's predictions for the Internet Consumer in 1997 and beyond. Prior to joining FIND/SVP's Emerging Technologies Research Group, David was with BIS Strategic Decisions (now GIGA Information Group) at the time it was a division of NYNEX Corporation. He has been employed by Metaphor Computer Systems and XEROX Corporation in the marketing of the first technology products from the Palo Alto Research Center. David is a Graduate of the University of Wisconsin. This meeting of the Digital Commerce Society of Boston will be held on Tuesday, February 4, 1997 from 12pm - 2pm at the Downtown Branch of the Harvard Club of Boston, One Federal Street. The price for lunch is $27.50. This price includes lunch, room rental, and the speaker's lunch. ;-). The Harvard Club *does* have dress code: jackets and ties for men, and "appropriate business attire" for women. We will attempt to record this meeting and put it on the web in RealAudio format at some future date We need to receive a company check, or money order, (or, if we *really* know you, a personal check) payable to "The Harvard Club of Boston", by Saturday, February 1, or you won't be on the list for lunch. Checks payable to anyone else but The Harvard Club of Boston will have to be sent back. Checks should be sent to Robert Hettinga, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02131. Again, they *must* be made payable to "The Harvard Club of Boston". If anyone has questions, or has a problem with these arrangements (We've had to work with glacial A/P departments more than once, for instance), please let us know via e-mail, and we'll see if we can work something out. Planned speakers for DCSB are: March Daniel Greenwood The Role of State Government in Digital Commerce April Stewart Baker Encryption Policy and Digital Commerce We are actively searching for future speakers. If you are in Boston on the first Tuesday of the month, and you would like to make a presentation to the Society, please send e-mail to the DCSB Program Commmittee, care of Robert Hettinga, <mailto: rah@shipwright.com> . For more information about the Digital Commerce Society of Boston, send "info dcsb" in the body of a message to <mailto: majordomo@ai.mit.edu> . If you want to subscribe to the DCSB e-mail list, send "subscribe dcsb" in the body of a message to <mailto: majordomo@ai.mit.edu> . Looking forward to seeing you there! Cheers, Robert Hettinga Moderator, The Digital Commerce Society of Boston -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Pretty Safe Mail 1.0 iQCVAwUBMtxDivgyLN8bw6ZVAQE49gP+OwzyhPKcYc8r8E4l8RYDUHJvvcPa9XvD UYPZ4CnpkT3Q3Y9IXI573I2zYnI7qXv6nckU+F9GSIH8k2DdItp3YNl6mvf8+vgB 2yFCqHEL82H0kR9+xUIepCwtqZLz8BoO1Ee4KJJZl451KuA2jvAO5+T4P/U2uBHH z8oh9U7F0Dk= =NZD0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com), Philodox, e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "The cost of anything is the foregone alternative" -- Walter Johnson The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/rah/ FC97: Anguilla, anyone? http://offshore.com.ai/fc97/
Robert Hettinga wrote:
The Digital Commerce Society of Boston Presents The group provides numerous Fortune 500 companies with detailed research and analysis on behaviors and preferences of Internet consumers.
Mr. Kaufman will discuss the Internet as a consumer platform.
As in "Make $$$Money$$$ fast? Does putting on a suit and writing 'executive-oriented' postings in a pompous, pretentious manner raise this type of posting above the level of ordinary UCE/Spam? I don't think so. Does moderation mean that UCE postings that promise 'champagne and caviar' are acceptable, while 'crackers and cheese' post-conference promises are 'spam'? Will 'Subject: Consumer Platform / Make $$$Money Fast' be an 'acceptable' heading, whereas 'Subject: Make $$$Money Fast / Consumer Platform' is 'not acceptable'? Toto "Moderate suits, not jeans." (I've got some fine suits, thank you very much. I wear them at weddings, funerals, and whenever I want to 'screw' somebody.)
On Wed, 15 Jan 1997, Toto wrote:
Robert Hettinga wrote:
The Digital Commerce Society of Boston Presents The group provides numerous Fortune 500 companies with detailed research and analysis on behaviors and preferences of Internet consumers.
Mr. Kaufman will discuss the Internet as a consumer platform.
As in "Make $$$Money$$$ fast? Does putting on a suit and writing 'executive-oriented' postings in a pompous, pretentious manner raise this type of posting above the level of ordinary UCE/Spam? I don't think so.
Does moderation mean that UCE postings that promise 'champagne and caviar' are acceptable, while 'crackers and cheese' post-conference promises are 'spam'? Will 'Subject: Consumer Platform / Make $$$Money Fast' be an 'acceptable' heading, whereas 'Subject: Make $$$Money Fast / Consumer Platform' is 'not acceptable'?
The finer SPAMS of life..what else would you want.
Toto "Moderate suits, not jeans." (I've got some fine suits, thank you very much. I wear them at weddings, funerals, and whenever I want to 'screw' somebody.)
How often is this??
At 3:40 am -0500 1/15/97, Toto emetted onto the livingroom carpet:
As in "Make $$$Money$$$ fast? Does putting on a suit and writing 'executive-oriented' postings in a pompous, pretentious manner raise this type of posting above the level of ordinary UCE/Spam? I don't think so.
Does moderation mean that UCE postings that promise 'champagne and caviar' are acceptable, while 'crackers and cheese' post-conference promises are 'spam'? Will 'Subject: Consumer Platform / Make $$$Money Fast' be an 'acceptable' heading, whereas 'Subject: Make $$$Money Fast / Consumer Platform' is 'not acceptable'?
I fished this out of my killfile. Ironically, I had just plonked Toto yesterday because I saw no compelling merit in anything he has posted to cypherpunks since he got here, and given the quantity of his posts, he was starting to waste my attention. However, this morning, as my mail was coming down in Eudora, I saw that he had replied to this month's DCSB announcement, and, frankly, I knew that it had to be something like this. However, I couldn't, heh, let sleeping dogs lie... When I sent the posting in question to the cryptography groups, I figured that this month's DCSB meeting would not not be especially on topic, even for cypherpunks :-). However, there are lots of cypherpunks who come to DCSB meetings, and I expect that some cypherpunks will come to this one, too. Suits, champaigne, caviar, and all. ;-). More like suits, iced tea, and chicken-of-the-month, but, hey, the view's nice, anyway. By the way, Find/SVP is a well known market research company, and since a lot of us on cypherpunks sell our stuff on the net, if not directly to consumers, I figured the topic might be at least tenuously useful to those here. There's even a (very!) shaky privacy/crypto connection both in the methods for collecting these kinds of data, and, of course, in the data's use in building crypto applications and policy. In addition, most companies pay for this kind of information. David will be presenting it free, almost immediately after it's collation. Anyway, I apologize to anyone this has offended. Except, of course, for certain, um, dogs. <Now, where's Toto? It looks like he needs a physic... Toto!!! Here, Boy! Waaalkies!!!!> Cheers, Bob Hettinga Moderator, The Digital Commerce Society of Boston ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com), Philodox, e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "The cost of anything is the foregone alternative" -- Walter Johnson The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/rah/ FC97: Anguilla, anyone? http://offshore.com.ai/fc97/
Robert Hettinga wrote:
I fished this out of my killfile. Ironically, I had just plonked Toto yesterday because I saw no compelling merit in anything he has posted to cypherpunks since he got here, and given the quantity of his posts, he was starting to waste my attention. However, this morning, as my mail was coming down in Eudora, I saw that he had replied to this month's DCSB announcement, and, frankly, I knew that it had to be something like this.
Why do people feel compelled to 'explain' how they 'chanced' to read items in their 'killfile'? It always seems to me to be for the purpose of insulting someone while keeping egg off of their own face.
When I sent the posting in question to the cryptography groups, I figured that this month's DCSB meeting would not not be especially on topic, even for cypherpunks :-).
Anyway, I apologize to anyone this has offended. Except, of course, for certain, um, dogs.
I didn't consider it particularly off-topic, myself. I was jes' fishin.
<Now, where's Toto? It looks like he needs a physic... Toto!!! Here, Boy! Waaalkies!!!!>
And it looks like I 'caught' one. Toto
participants (3)
-
Nurdane Oksas -
Robert Hettinga -
Toto