At 01:00 AM 2/9/96 -0800, lunaslide@loop.com wrote:

to speak your mind on the matter, as you are now. People talking about gay rights, abortion options, better sex (a la Dr. Ruth) can no longer do that on the net without wondering whether they are in violation of the bill or not.

If people where more used to regularly violating laws, one more law violation would mean much. Practice makes perfect. "Your Honor, I plead necessity. The reason I violated this law was so that I would have plenty of practice in case I ever find myself in a totalitarian state. Since the laws of the US and International Law permit (and in some cases require) me to violate the laws of a totalitarian state, I need to practice law violation under the less stressful circumstances of the current US. Without practice, I won't be able to violate totalitarian laws smoothly and thus might have to obey them. This could put me in jeopardy under International Law. Necessity defense." DCF