Re: key for Alice as promised (not)
Can you imagine?? I'm simply not willing to fool myself into thinking that I ahve security by posting a key and using PGP.
Unless you can post some proof that PGP is insecure, stop insisting it is. -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6 mQBtAzCNppQAAAEDALhWZl7IuGZ9zZT5bACo0b/1L0Nv0C72vKHIO3IHh+cwpHHa 2Ozb9aeO0UvXGwkkZIYgUm0EvmzKh7yb1GTLvBp5kXpR3I9w+Yj4LGlBDERpUWw6 x4ED49pwDnz1Hl5FBQAFEbQYYXNoIDxhaHVwcEBwcmltZW5ldC5jb20+ =PtJK -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
On Tue, 28 Nov 1995, Adam Hupp wrote:
Can you imagine?? I'm simply not willing to fool myself into thinking that I ahve security by posting a key and using PGP.
Unless you can post some proof that PGP is insecure, stop insisting it is.
Hold on a minute. Alice is, here, 100% correct. If I use PGP to read messages and there's a videocamera trained on the keyboard, and other people have access to the machine, PGP is not secure. Similarly, if PGP is on a computer which other people may use without my supervision, they can monitor keystrokes, etc. and PGP is not secure. A chain is only as strong as its weakest link; Alice recognizes this, and makes no claim that PGP itself is the weak link. The weak link is the physical security of the system which Alice claims to use. Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu> (410)494-3072 Visit my home page at http://www.goucher.edu/~jlasser/ You have a friend at the NSA: Big Brother is watching. Finger for PGP key.
participants (2)
-
ahupp@primenet.com -
Jon Lasser