VOTE: Proposition desist: no
Shut Detweiler out of the cpunx list? no. I have no problem skipping his posts; presently I'm not worried about the bandwidth through the modem into /dev/null. He posts interesting things once in a while (most recently, that piece by Kapor about libertarians vs. "decentralists.") I wouldn't mind the creation of a special "Detweiler free" filtered version of the list, as long as it was just a postprocessor on the true list. -fnerd quote me -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.3a aKxB8nktcBAeQHabQP/d7yhWgpGZBIoIqII8cY9nG55HYHgvtoxiQCVAgUBLMs3K ui6XaCZmKH68fOWYYySKAzPkXyfYKnOlzsIjp2toust1Q5A3/n54PBKrUDN9tHVz 3Ch466q9EKUuDulTU6OLsilzmRvQJn0EJhzd4pht6hanC0R3seYNhUYhoJViCcCG sRjLQs4iVVM= =9wqs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Shut Detweiler out of the cpunx list? no.
I have no problem skipping his posts;
I have a problem with people skipping Detweiler posts, and then assuming they have the knowledge needed to vote on this issue. A glaring example of the failings of democracy. Ignorance of what Detweiler has posted is about the only reason one would justify the presence of somebody whose posts are intended to harass and disrupt the list, by slandering and threatening its members. The Extropians list with its filtering which keeps out net stalkers and harassers, has become superior to this highly disrupted list, and unfortuneately I've had to move much of my cypherpunks-related posting over there (eg an excellent thread we've had on "Graynet"). This doesn't stop Detweiler from attacking me via anon.penet.fi in front of the entire world on Usenet and RISKS, but filtering would keep at least this formerly high quality list sane. My thanks go out to Doug Barnes, Derek Upham, Eli Brandt, Eric Hughes, others who've helped out in the efforts to defend ourselves against this threat, and to Hal Finney et. al. for continuing to post high-quality material to cypherpunks among the flames. Nick Szabo szabo@netcom.com
participants (2)
-
fnerd@smds.com -
szabo@netcom.com