IRS Subscribed to Cypherpunks
Got the following bounce. The Cc: was to a real address. DCF
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 1996 05:24:21 -0500 From: Administrator@ccmail.irs.gov (Administrator) Subject: Message not deliverable To: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com> Cc: XXXXXXXXX (Administrator) Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
At 04:45 AM 11/4/96 -0800, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Libertarianism is not incompatible with strict regulations, as long as the rules violate nobody's rights.
-Declan
Obviously many voluntary religious organizations have quite strict rules for their members and are compatible with libertarianism. Government monopoly regulations that cannot be opted out of are not compatible with libertarianism. Instead of using the loaded term "regulations' it might be better to call things like the rules of the cypherpunk's list "club rules" or protocols.
DCF
Duncan Frissell wrote:
Got the following bounce. The Cc: was to a real address.
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 1996 05:24:21 -0500 From: Administrator@ccmail.irs.gov (Administrator) Subject: Message not deliverable To: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com> Cc: XXXXXXXXX (Administrator) Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
At 04:45 AM 11/4/96 -0800, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Libertarianism is not incompatible with strict regulations, as long as the rules violate nobody's rights.
Obviously many voluntary religious organizations have quite strict rules for their members and are compatible with libertarianism. Government monopoly regulations that cannot be opted out of are not compatible with libertarianism. Instead of using the loaded term "regulations' it might be better to call things like the rules of the cypherpunk's list "club rules" or protocols.
Could be several things. The IRS has (as of my visit in early 1996, anyway) adopted the "hitman" technique of auditing, with specific per-hour $ goals, like traffic cops. I'd guess at three things here. 1) Anyone hawking a product or engaging in barter, etc. who is not paying the maximum tax, and 2) Studying certain aspects of net behavior or usage for tax purposes, and 3) Trolling for fraud.
On Tue, 5 Nov 1996, Duncan Frissell wrote: I've been getting a few of these too, to replies I've posted to cypherpunks@toad.com. Interestingly enough, one came up from my filtered list. :(
Got the following bounce. The Cc: was to a real address.
DCF
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 1996 05:24:21 -0500 From: Administrator@ccmail.irs.gov (Administrator) Subject: Message not deliverable To: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com> Cc: XXXXXXXXX (Administrator) Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
At 04:45 AM 11/4/96 -0800, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Libertarianism is not incompatible with strict regulations, as long as the rules violate nobody's rights.
-Declan
Obviously many voluntary religious organizations have quite strict rules for their members and are compatible with libertarianism. Government monopoly regulations that cannot be opted out of are not compatible with libertarianism. Instead of using the loaded term "regulations' it might be better to call things like the rules of the cypherpunk's list "club rules" or protocols.
DCF
============================================================================= + ^ + | Ray Arachelian |FL| KAOS KERAUNOS KYBERNETOS |==/|\== \|/ |sunder@sundernet.com|UL|__Nothing_is_true,_all_is_permitted!_|=/\|/\= <--+-->| ------------------ |CG|What part of 'Congress shall make no |=\/|\/= /|\ | "A toast to Odin, |KA| law abridging the freedom of speech'|==\|/== + v + |God of screwdrivers"|AK| do you not understand? |======= ========================http://www.sundernet.com============================= If the Macintosh is a woman... Then Windows is a Transvestite! ActiveX! ActiveX! Format Hard drive? Just say yes!
participants (3)
-
Dale Thorn -
Duncan Frissell -
Ray Arachelian