Re: National Socio-Economic Security Need for Encryption Technology
Mike McNally wrote:
Bart Croughs wrote:
... better arguments (after reading the books I suggested)
Like what is it with you and these books? Is "Austrian" a code word for "Divine omniscient extraterrestrial super-being"?
No, but a number of posters claimed they were Austrians, and among them was Timothy May. So if I can show that Timothy's statements contradict the economic theories he says he supports on the most fundamental level (the level of methodology), then I have a pretty solid case that he is a bit confused and that he should do his homework better before he continues arguing. Unless of course he can show the Austrians (or me) to be wrong; but he hasn't done this yet. >Through all this sophist gibberish I've completely lost track of >what exactly it is you're trying to say. I don't blame you when you get the impression that Austrian methodology, compressed in a couple of sentences, is sophist gibberish. Without the proper background knowledge, this is probably unavoidable; methodology is a rather difficult subject. But if you are really interested and want to know more about it, you now know where to look... Bart Croughs
Bart Croughs typed, deftly avoiding the enormous key labeled "Return":
I don't blame you when you get the impression that Austrian methodology, compressed in a couple of sentences, is sophist gibberish.
Seems to me that ya gotta be mighty careful when interpreting piles of egghead "gedanken" experiments. If you feel you can squeeze the contents of one more book into your head, I'd suggest one by another economist (sorta), Stuart Chase's "Tyranny of Words". ______c_________________________________________________________________ Mike M Nally * Tiv^H^H^H IBM * Austin TX * For the time being, m5@tivoli.com * m101@io.com * <URL:http://www.io.com/~m101> * three heads and eight arms.
participants (2)
-
Bart Croughs -
Mike McNally