-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Jim Ray wrote:

Rollo Silver wrote:

[snip]

...

2. Suppose someone writes a program Z that has no expicit crypto code in it, but has hooks for installing one or another version of PGP. Given a copy of Z, someone in this country could install PGP he got from MIT, whereas someone in Europe could install the international version. Would export of Z violate ITAR restrictions?

Yes. JMR

Does this mean that exporting Private Idaho, PGPfront, WinPGP, etc. would be a violation of ITAR because they function only when combined with PGP and contain "hooks" for using PGP? I don't recall any restrictions on who could download these files from their host sites. Mark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQB1AwUBMl6ZSN36bir1/qfZAQGUWAMAmbh59CK2wMBt/AVCEcwoiknVgIYMNRmS B2s4YJyvq5QQnUkynUcMSU17vltRhwQyapz22lg4rZZxYIoEC0P3vVDkH3mPCnnE qPSMtwtV+o1//cOQHjD7VfjeScO69R7u =Np5A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mark Heaney finger snipe@starburst.cbl.cees.edu for public key PGP Fingerprint= BB D8 9B 07 51 87 05 AC 47 7B F2 4F A6 AB 1A CD ----------------------------------------------------------------- You keep using that word, I dunna think it means what you think it means.