Forwarded message:

From: lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) Subject: Re: CMR versus GAK? (fwd) > Right to monitor Date: 24 Oct 1997 14:01:04 GMT

...

Does the owner of a resource have an inherent right to control that resource and if so what are the boundaries?

He has this right until he touchs the rights of other people. So he have not all rights he might want.

...

Does the user of a resource have rights outside the purvue of the owner of that resource and if so what are the boundaries?

Do you own your house? If not, why do you stop your house owner from snooping in your flat? It's his ressource. Why do you encrypt e-mails over your provider's lines? It's his ressource.

If privacy is outlawed in offices, nobody can work legally.

If this is the best argument and explanation of them you can muster then quit now. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there | | be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves. | | | | -Alan Greenspan- | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage@ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|