At 10:12 AM 2/13/97 -0500, Pete Capelli wrote:

jim bell wrote:

...

At 03:25 PM 2/12/97 -0800, Timothy C. May wrote:

<Some deleted>

...

even more happy to pay, say, 10 cents to each recipient. At that rate, an average person would probably receive enough "spam" to pay for his Internet account, quite analogous to the way advertiser-supported TV is presented to the public for no explicit charge.

Yes, but why does monetary compensation make it then O.K.?

What, exactly, is your definition of "O.K."? I didn't say that would make it "O.K." Rather, the inclusion of the money makes the spam somewhat more tolerable of an intrusion than it would otherwise be. Jim Bell jimbell@pacifier.com