Responding to msg by eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes) on Mon, 28 Nov 9:54 PM

I am still considering the "sign-or-delay" proposal for the toad.com server, that is, sign your articles to the list or they'll be delayed and eventually rejected.

Does not everyone get a complete header like the one below from Eric's post with incoming mail? This is presented automagically by The Pipeline's system. I had assumed that because every mail received here has such a header that everyone else could also see who sent my mail, signed or not. That is why I have not signed my posts. BTW, Pipeline does not allow anonymously-sent direct mail -- as a take it or leave it policy. So we cannot manipulate headers to forge from this Windows-driven end. John Young (redundantly, I thought)

From owner-cypherpunks@toad.com Tue Nov 29 00:01 EST 1994 Received: from relay2.UU.NET (relay2.UU.NET [192.48.96.7]) by pipeline.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA09928 for <jya@pipeline.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 1994 00:01:20 -0500 Received: from toad.com by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP id QQxsbj13332; Mon, 28 Nov 1994 23:59:02 -0500 Received: by toad.com id AA15623; Mon, 28 Nov 94 20:55:57 PST Received: from largo.remailer.net ([204.94.187.1]) by toad.com id AA15611; Mon, 28 Nov 94 20:55:29 PST Received: (from eric@localhost) by largo.remailer.net (8.6.8/8.6.6) id VAA02536; Mon, 28 Nov 1994 21:54:14 -0800 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 1994 21:54:14 -0800 Message-Id: <199411290554.VAA02536@largo.remailer.net> To: cypherpunks@toad.com In-Reply-To: <199411282330.RAA00186@omaha.omaha.com> (message from Alex Strasheim on Mon, 28 Nov 1994 17:30:22 -0600 (CST)) Subject: Re: Transparent Email From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes) Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com Precedence: bulk Content-Type: text Content-Length: 6504