Read my earlier post re: this. Clinton already said he'd veto SAFE. At 10:00 AM 8/5/97 -0700, stewarts@ix.netcom.com wrote:

At 04:36 PM 8/4/97 -0700, Ernest Hua wrote:

...

Does anyone have any idea whether Clinton's threat of using the line-item veto against portions of the big spending bill could be leverage against some pro-SAFE legislators?

The line item veto doesn't eliminate the political games in the budget, it just changes the details a bit. Sure, he could threaten to veto their favorite pork-barrel projects for crossing him on crypto, just as he could threaten to veto them if they don't support his favorite pork. But as someone else said, he can threaten to veto the crypto bill itself, or (perhaps worse) threaten to veto it unless it's "balanced", by including controls on domestic cryptography in return for letting Big Business export more products.

# Thanks; Bill # Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com # You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/pgp # (If this is a mailing list or news, please Cc: me on replies. Thanks.)