Re: get mix-installer. (fwd)
Forwarded message:
From adam@lighthouse.homeport.org Fri Jan 5 20:23:21 1996 From: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org> Message-Id: <199601060225.VAA21165@homeport.org> Subject: Re: get mix-installer. To: ravage@ssz.com (Jim Choate) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 21:25:59 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <199601060152.TAA04065@einstein.ssz.com> from "Jim Choate" at Jan 5, 96 07:52:17 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8b] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 367
Jim Choate wrote:
| I would like a copy to use in my consulting business as well as put on the | Austin Cypherpunks ftp site.
Both are fine. I assume that a copy was auto mailed to you; let me know if there is a problem.
May I ask who pays to get mixmasters installed?
-- "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -Hume
In a earlier message I received from Adam I mistook his auto-remailers scripts responce as a refusal to supply the afformentioned code. I apoligize for my ignorance and retract any negative statements or implications that I may have made. In the last year I have had a couple of local business people and about a dozen individuals ask about remailers and using PGP. I currently have a couple of state political activists in the gun lobby who have begun using it for internal communications. I am hoping to have another machine installed in the next couple of weeks with mixmaster available. It is my intention to run a remailer here in Texas with the help of the local cpunks (I hope) in order to demonstrate what the technology is capable of. I see this script as a major advance in making the software more palatable to the general populace. My current business plan is to educate several international translaters I work with about the technology. They work with foreign patents being applied for here in the US and they typicaly must sign non-disclosure agreements to get the contracts. Such technology may be something they find useful. Jim Choate
participants (1)
-
Jim Choate