Re: meaningless rumor
17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
5:17 p.m.
Assuming that whoevever implemented PGP did not himself import the cipher, but based the implementation on the EUROCRYPT '90 paper that was 'imported' by Springer-Verlag, I don't understand what the basis would be for such a charge. Now an indictment against Springer for shipping the proceedings (which contained C source code for IDEA) into the US - that would be interesting... As you say, ``assuming''. The Feds can afford to lose that count because of the facts of this case; they can't afford to lose on a point of law. I don't know what the facts are, or what they can prove about them. They may not, either, at this point, pending the results of the grand jury probe.
8169
Age (days ago)
8169
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
smb@research.att.com