Are we gatewayed to Usenet
Never. I don't _ever_ want to see this made into a 'semi-private' mailing list. Extropians, for example, does this, and it's ended up being an incestuous, closed group, with extremely low signal-to-noise ratio; as the same groups of people chatter and blather about the same subjects to no end. I'd rather have the list the way it is. At least the noise is usually _new_ noise; and new signal comes in constantly. I even prefer it with L. Detweiler; perhaps he'll cease his rather garbled rants and return to being a constructive poster. In any case, if this sort of thing were ever to be put to a vote, I'd be emailing everyone I knew not to have anything to do with such a giddy, doomed proposal. ---- Robert W. F. Clark PGP Key Available Upon Request rclark@nyx.cs.du.edu clark@metal.psu.edu
Clark Reynard says:
Never. I don't _ever_ want to see this made into a 'semi-private' mailing list. Extropians, for example, does this, and it's ended up being an incestuous, closed group, with extremely low signal-to-noise ratio; as the same groups of people chatter and blather about the same subjects to no end.
The participants would say that they have a very high signal to noise ratio. The fact that you didn't like the signals and would prefer different ones means you were not suited to the interests discussed on that list, not that the experiment has not been a success. Perry
participants (2)
-
Clark Reynard -
Perry E. Metzger