On 27 May 96 at 21:46, Subir Grewal wrote:

...

Oh, you mean, "for them, anybody who pass a judgment of his own that :contradict them should be killed" I see...

Glad you noticed that. Now tell me how AP for any other cause is different?

It has similarities. But AP will not be the enforcer of *one* opinion. And, according to Jim Bell, people will realize that the best way to behave is to adopt a low profile. Again, this is where I do not agree with JB, although I cannot say I disagree. I simply do not know. Maybe, since the basis for sustenance of human life is production, and since the majority has to be producers, the majority will endorse more libertarians ideas. But again, maybe Joe Average was so convinced that "the rich" owe him a free lunch that AP will lead to complete destruction of the system. I personnally tend to believe that Joe Average still has some common sense and integrity. JFA PLEASE NOTE: THIS POST DOES NOT MEAN THAT I ENDORSE MR. BELL'S SYSTEM. MY RATIONNAL CONCLUSIONS ABOUT IT'S INTERNAL MECHANICS AND IT'S INTRINSIC LOGICS DOES NOT MEAN THAT I LIKE NOR ENDORSE THE SYSTEM. I SIMPLY CONCLUDED THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PREVENT THE SYSTEM FROM BEING IMPLEMENTED. IMO, IT IS UNAVOIDABLE. DePompadour, Societe d'Importation Ltee Limoges porcelain, Silverware and mouth blown crystal glasses JFA Technologies, R&D consultants. Physists, technologists and engineers. PGP keys at: http://w3.citenet.net/users/jf_avon ID# C58ADD0D : 529645E8205A8A5E F87CC86FAEFEF891