...

Some people have wondered whether including RSAREF 1, rather than RSAREF version 2, is an oversight in the PGP 2.6 distribution. It is not an oversight. Version 1 is what we intended. something smells here. Most likely the fact that the RSAREF 2.x licence is a lot more liberal about commercial use. (read it yourself, but to sum it up it does allow

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Subject: Re: PGP 2.6 uses RSAREF version 1 limited commercial use). This means that one can still use RIPEM and TIS/PEM for many commercial applications. With PGP one would have to buy a licence (presumably from ViaCrypt). e.g. communications between employees of a company about business matters. Mark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.4 iQBVAgUBLeLXBWrJdmD9QWqxAQGigwIAl1moi1OPFa78yVNeNBd1JGyQ59jnOfUL FOOuqE/9zNQCQBoYZtTtHtGxQQLWOw1YtbgDcW3Q3jHQ3pkeQwlwWA== =m3Zf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Mark Henderson markh@wimsey.bc.ca - RIPEM MD5: F1F5F0C3984CBEAF3889ADAFA2437433 ViaCrypt PGP key fingerprint: 21 F6 AF 2B 6A 8A 0B E1 A1 2A 2A 06 4A D5 92 46 low security key fingerprint: EC E7 C3 A9 2C 30 25 C6 F9 E1 25 F3 F5 AF 92 E3 cryptography archive maintainer -- anon ftp to ftp.wimsey.bc.ca:/pub/crypto