Even more unix holy war. Was "Clinton freezes U.S. assets .."
And did I mention that in DOS you can type rename *.txt *.asc to turn all *.txt files into the corresponding *.asc file but that if in unix you type mv *.txt *.asc not only will it not rename your *.txt files to be *.asc files, but if you have only two *.txt files it will silently destroy the second and issue no warning that anything has gone amiss. Hell, it is only the users data -- stupid user, he can type it in again. And of course I have already mentioned the unix "make" utility. --------------------------------------------------------------------- | We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.catalog.com/jamesd/ and our property, because of the kind | of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald derives from this right, not from the | arbitrary power of the omnipotent state. | jamesd@netcom.com
jamesd@com.informix.com says:
And did I mention that in DOS you can type rename *.txt *.asc to turn all *.txt files into the corresponding *.asc file
but that if in unix you type mv *.txt *.asc not only will it not rename your *.txt files to be *.asc files, but if you have only two *.txt files it will silently destroy the second and issue no warning that anything has gone amiss.
In Unix, I can use a single command to delete an entire file tree -- rm -r. In DOS, I have to delete each directory by hand. This isn't how you evaluate these things, James.
And of course I have already mentioned the unix "make" utility.
DOS doesn't even have a make utility -- perhaps you should do without using make ever again, as DOS is obviously superior. Perry
On Fri, 27 Jan 1995, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
In Unix, I can use a single command to delete an entire file tree -- rm -r. In DOS, I have to delete each directory by hand.
Use the command deltree /y. Or any of the cool third party utilities, or the windows file manager which offers a true hierarchical view unlike the hierarchical view offered by the sun OS file manager.
DOS doesn't even have a make utility -- perhaps you should do without using make ever again, as DOS is obviously superior.
I wonder how I have been compiling my files all these years. I use make and nmake to do any non procedural task in DOS that involves file dates and file existence, not just to compile files. --------------------------------------------------------------------- | We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.catalog.com/jamesd/ and our property, because of the kind | of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald derives from this right, not from the | arbitrary power of the omnipotent state. | jamesd@netcom.com
JAMES DONALD FLAME WAR CONTINUED -- DELETE BEFORE READING "James A. Donald" says:
On Fri, 27 Jan 1995, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
In Unix, I can use a single command to delete an entire file tree -- rm -r. In DOS, I have to delete each directory by hand.
Use the command deltree /y.
It didn't exist until recently. Neither did utilities for moving around files or directories.
Or any of the cool third party utilities, or the windows file manager which offers a true hierarchical view unlike the hierarchical view offered by the sun OS file manager.
Oooh, sorry. You don't get to have it both ways. If you can talk about third party utilities, then I get to point out that there are dozens of cool third party file browsers. If I don't get to talk about third party software, then you don't either.
DOS doesn't even have a make utility -- perhaps you should do without using make ever again, as DOS is obviously superior.
I wonder how I have been compiling my files all these years.
With make from third parties. If you want make on unix to do something different, you can just get the sources (for free usually) and get it do do anything you like. And guess, by the way, where make was invented -- hint: not Microsoft. .pm
participants (3)
-
James A. Donald -
jamesd＠com.informix.com -
Perry E. Metzger