Internal Passports
At 1:01 AM 8/6/96, Duncan Frissell wrote:
The SS resists issuing new numbers in spite of widespread duplication and theft. Soon people will find themselves denied the right to work in this country unless the SS reverses this reluctance. If your SS# is stolen and used "too many times" in a future worker verification program, you're screwed. And there won't even be any welfare for you.
Use Alta Vista to find the SS Number FAQ. There's more stuff.
BTW, I attempted to comply with the law in a recent request posted to ba.jobs.offered and scruz.general: I solicited workers for some brush clearing on my place, but advised them to only apply if--appearing to be Hispanic, Latin, Mexican, or otherwise unOfficial--they provided proof of their legal ability to work for me. Personally, I don't care. In fact, when employing gardeners and yard works I prefer Mexicans. But the law says, these days, that I must verify the legality of workers *if* they appear to be dark-skinned, Mexican, Latin, or the like. I say "if" because there are no requirements in general for white-skinned, Anglo workers....no work permits, no proofs of citizenship (such a document is currently lacking in the American pantheon...I, a mixed descendant of Mayflower colonist and Scandinavian immigrants, lack such "proof"). Predictably, I got e-mail threatening me with legal action (ha!) and claiming me to be a racist. I promise not to ask my potential employees for legal proof of their right to work if the Feds and Sacramentans promise not to make it a law that I check such things, and if the laws are not written such that I am a felon for not asking for such documents from a dark, dusky Mexican but not from a blonde- or red-haired ubermensch. (Jews I haven't figured out...some seem to pass the "no documents required test" and some I want to demand Green Cards for...ironically, it may be "discrimination" for me to request that these "dusky" folks supply proof of their permission to work in these Beknighted States. A strange world we live in.) --Tim May Boycott "Big Brother Inside" software! We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed. ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Licensed Ontologist | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May) writes:
Predictably, I got e-mail threatening me with legal action (ha!) and claiming me to be a racist.
I promise not to ask my potential employees for legal proof of their right to work if the Feds and Sacramentans promise not to make it a law that I check such things, and if the laws are not written such that I am a felon for not asking for such documents from a dark, dusky Mexican but not from a blonde- or red-haired ubermensch.
Yet, when the laws are "improved" to apply to all equally, people still bitch. The producers of the geriatric porn film "Grandma Does Grandpa", and the popular sequel, "Grandma Does Grandpa II", must show at the beginning of the film the address where the legally required affidavits proving that Grandma and Grandpa are over 18 years of age are available for inspection. If they fail to do this, of course, they are child pornographers, and may fork over many decades of their lives and hundreds of thousands of their dollars towards the official government crusade to protect our nation's youth from exploitation. The fact that Grandma and Grandpa are obviously within mere months of buying the farm does nothing to mitigate their offense, should they decide that the law is not worth bothering with. "What are you in for?" "Child Porn." "How old were the kids?" "In their mid 70s." "Ewwwwwww. That's sick man! You're disgusting." :) -- Mike Duvos $ PGP 2.6 Public Key available $ mpd@netcom.com $ via Finger. $
Mike's post reminds me of the latest maneuvering here in DC. The Hatch simulated "child porn" bill was reported out of the Senate judiciary committee favorably, with the addition of language making it a felony to *attempt* to view child porn. This wording is aimed at the Net: "Click Here to see Young Girls in Lust." -Declan On Mon, 5 Aug 1996, Mike Duvos wrote:
The producers of the geriatric porn film "Grandma Does Grandpa", and the popular sequel, "Grandma Does Grandpa II", must show at the beginning of the film the address where the legally required affidavits proving that Grandma and Grandpa are over 18 years of age are available for inspection.
If they fail to do this, of course, they are child pornographers, and may fork over many decades of their lives and hundreds of thousands of their dollars towards the official government crusade to protect our nation's youth from exploitation.
The fact that Grandma and Grandpa are obviously within mere months of buying the farm does nothing to mitigate their offense, should they decide that the law is not worth bothering with.
"What are you in for?"
"Child Porn."
"How old were the kids?"
"In their mid 70s."
"Ewwwwwww. That's sick man! You're disgusting."
:)
-- Mike Duvos $ PGP 2.6 Public Key available $ mpd@netcom.com $ via Finger. $
// declan@eff.org // I do not represent the EFF // declan@well.com //
participants (3)
-
Declan McCullagh -
mpd@netcom.com -
tcmay@got.net