...

Lucky Green says: At 10:30 PM 2/5/95, Dan Harmon wrote: I just saw an item on CNN about a company in LA called Art Guard. It sells an ink that is created using your dna as a protection against forged signatures.

Why not just sign in blood?

The same occured to me.

Perry

Yes, this would work even better! If the ink just contained your DNA, someone could use PCR to duplicate it! If you actually signed in blood, they would have to match the type and if a white blood cell was there they would have to "forge" the mitochondria since they have different DNA! This is not to mention other blood factors. There is prime material here for Klaus! on the the difficulties of running "blood remailers" "anonymous bloodletting," etc..... Brian D Williams Cypherpatriot "Prime material here" heh heh!