-- [ From: amp * EMC.Ver #2.3 ] -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- From: Jack P. Starrantino \ Internet: (jps@monad.semcor.com) JS> I bring nothing cypher-wise. I would be willing to help walk the JS> s/w-engineering dog and to write Motif/X/socket if the chosen platform JS> is UN*X, however. JS> So, from an engineering standpoint, what should the "future" look JS> like? unfortunately, it appears to me that if you _really_ want encryption to be universal, it's gotta be done on windoze, it's gotta be point-n-click and seamless to the mail application. i would prefer it if the masses would use a real operating system, (no o/s wars please. i started in a mini/mainframe environment and simply don't think dos/windoze qualify your mileage may vary), but that just ain't the way it is. would netscape be selling at $130+ if they only wrote for unix? my 2 cents amp <0003701548@mcimail.com> (since 10/31/88) <alan.pugh@internetmci.com> PGP Key = 57957C9D PGP FP = FA 02 84 7D 82 57 78 E4 E2 1C 7B 88 62 A6 F9 F7 November 29, 1995 17:40 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQEVAwUBMLzhU4dTfgZXlXydAQEC1gf+ImAvGk2ceQqCt8E0EC9rlFwrMgEmgkZk E+mBd88dB8TazZn1n7oXasjc0GIjMZZCQYft9gqzuQDLQ6ceK5MpIZuREFWJq6+U nyvq/ivkiGwB4ubZ48xG4EJS8094C+Xj4fG/zgtNVsQr0O6ln/6Q/+bt/ciqP9PZ 4gjP4VYpmiFEQ3OGW/oYevmAxdvYYRoWEfjUwmG8tHKORWo9yfDs9yJHHYo3StmX SqM47v2F3D1r5JBgdrrIdOElwJHchU31kwk7trDs0/Ne7HWDdgIsX2MoDCW/Dwdt SaTC3B5TVpz6G/+FvxUSRWgY5vU1sqnCT5WogqTfJRP5ohz5rt6nqQ== =IB4/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----