~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SANDY SANDFORT Reply to: ssandfort@attmail.com . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C'punks, Jim Miller wrote: . . . Somebody could create a Document Server to store encrypted documents. Users would somehow get an anonymous Document Server account number when they subscribe to the service. Users would use the remailer system to send encrypted documents to the Document Server. . . . Given a Document Server, the problem now becomes: How can you prevent the government from proving you use a Document Server. This seems like a strictly technical problem, unlike the "can they compel you to reveal your key" problem. /No hay problema/. The situation can be handled similarly to that of a "spendthrift trust." In that case, the trustee has complete discretion whether or to releases money to the beneficiary. Trustees NEVER release funds to the taxman or other creditors. If your Document Server is located in a foreign jurisdiction, and you instruct its operator NOT to release your files--even to you--if you are incarcerated or otherwise under duress, there's nothing the government can do. Just be sure you take all the necessary steps *prior* to coming under a court's jurisdiction. S a n d y

...

...

...

...

...

Please send e-mail to: ssandfort@attmail.com <<<<<<