DK> It would seem that things such as the CDA, etc, are patent violations of the DK> Bill of Rights. As such, wouldn't the Congressrodent(s) proposing such DK> measures be violating our civil rights, and thus be criminally liable? Congressional Immunity. DK> IANAL, of course, so I'll leave it up to those on the list who are to IANAL, either. But I have a thought, myself: [Please do not start an abortion flamefest on the list. If you want to argue it via Imail, I can handle that, but let's not bother the rest of the class, OK?] The Supremes found the right to have an abortion in some kind of "penumbral" right to <BOLD> privacy </BOLD>, which in turn came from Griswold v. Connecticut, if organic RAM serves. Given this precedent, may we challenge anti-crypto crap such as the Grassley Bill as a violation of the right to privacy? * Recursion: See "recursion". --- * Monster@FAmend.Com *