Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd)
Forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1998 08:05:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> Subject: Re: Clinton's fake apologies
On Fri, 11 Sep 1998, Jim Gillogly wrote:
If they <do> decide this is now a requirement for high office, I'd like to see all the Congresscritters who've had sex out of wedlock and concealed it take one step forward. Shall we make hypocrisy in high office impeachable also?
A better question is: If Clinton is guilty of perjury and other felonies, should he be impeached?
If you don't think about lying about sex and related issues under oath should be a crime, well, then change the law. But right now any form of lying under oath is perjury, whether you like it or not.
As rare as it is, I agree with Declan here. If Clinton would lie under oath about a non-crime (ie sex between consenting adults) what would he do if faced with a real issue? He should have said "Yeah, I had sex with her. What business is it of yours?". ____________________________________________________________________ The seeker is a finder. Ancient Persian Proverb The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------
participants (1)
-
Jim Choate