Re: PGP Inc has gone to the dogs
Cleaning out the dross, I found this. What was "broken" in pgp50? Reeza! At 10:16 AM 10/18/98 +0100, Adam Back wrote:
PGP Inc has taken leave of it's sense. Masses of untrue claims on web pages (take a look at examples below), no RSA support, no unix versions (other than old broken pgp50).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In <3.0.5.32.19981212031015.00a74d90@205.83.192.13>, on 12/12/98 at 03:10 AM, Reeza! <howree@cable.navy.mil> said:
Cleaning out the dross, I found this.
What was "broken" in pgp50?
In doing my port of 5.0 to OS/2 I found and patched a couple of minor bugs in pgp, none of them security related. I don't know what Adam is refering to as "broken" except perhaps the change in the commandline so 5.0 doesn't work with 2.6.x scripts & plugins.
At 10:16 AM 10/18/98 +0100, Adam Back wrote:
PGP Inc has taken leave of it's sense. Masses of untrue claims on web pages (take a look at examples below), no RSA support, no unix versions (other than old broken pgp50).
- -- - --------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Geiger III http://www.openpgp.net Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0 Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail. OS/2 PGP 5.0 at: http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html - --------------------------------------------------------------- Tag-O-Matic: DOS=HIGH? I knew it was on something... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i OS/2 for non-commercial use Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000 Charset: cp850 wj8DBQE2cbiMlHpjA6A1ypsRApwYAJ9/JOVfvaFqCWH4z9pE8ntBQyn3qwCgj7Uo GzSrbEYZoWwbGM1u2zJSwHY= =s57Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (2)
-
Reeza! -
William H. Geiger III