Re: [NOISE] aga isn't on cypherpunks... (and I'm glad)
I have a suggestion... How 'bout if everybody on this list dropped a procmail configuration that mailed aga@dhp.com and postmaster@dhp.com a copy of every message that originated from aga@dhp.com? Do you think he would start to "get it" then?
Why are these people so uptight? Sven MOSER016.JPG |__ |--> SVEN: a.k.a. Chris Blanc Internet consulting/Web design [ http://www.loop.com/~sven/ ] Some only sample the dark wine of life's blood...
On Sun, 17 Nov 1996, Sven wrote:
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 10:34:13 -0800 From: Sven <sven@loop.com> To: aga <aga@dhp.com> Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com Subject: Re: [NOISE] aga isn't on cypherpunks... (and I'm glad)
I have a suggestion... How 'bout if everybody on this list dropped a procmail configuration that mailed aga@dhp.com and postmaster@dhp.com a copy of every message that originated from aga@dhp.com? Do you think he would start to "get it" then?
That cocksucker is not dumb enough to try that. It is him who will get terminated after I talk with his postmaster.
Why are these people so uptight?
Sven
Maybe because John Gilmore is a faggot and takes it up the ass. That was the real reason behind the clash. Dr. Vulis just does not like Faggots, and Gilmore has admitted to being queer. The one thing must be said about the Internet is that Faggots are not allowed to have any Authority positions, and this John Gilmore Faggot violates that rule. Never trust anybody who does not fuck cunt. -aga
aga enscribed thusly:
On Sun, 17 Nov 1996, Sven wrote:
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 10:34:13 -0800 From: Sven <sven@loop.com> To: aga <aga@dhp.com> Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com Subject: Re: [NOISE] aga isn't on cypherpunks... (and I'm glad)
I have a suggestion... How 'bout if everybody on this list dropped a procmail configuration that mailed aga@dhp.com and postmaster@dhp.com a copy of every message that originated from aga@dhp.com? Do you think he would start to "get it" then?
That cocksucker is not dumb enough to try that. It is him who will get terminated after I talk with his postmaster.
You're the one who is not too bright. I got you're message to "my postmaster". He be me. :-) I wasn't too sympathetic (other than for your postmaster)... Want to try complaining to the company president? :-)
Why are these people so uptight?
Sven : : - Mindless drivel deleted... : -aga
Mike -- Michael H. Warfield | (770) 985-6132 | mhw@WittsEnd.com (The Mad Wizard) | (770) 925-8248 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/ NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471 | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
From: aga <aga@dhp.com>
Maybe because John Gilmore is a faggot and takes it up the ass. That was the real reason behind the clash. Dr. Vulis just does not like Faggots, and Gilmore has admitted to being queer.
So why did Vulis drag the rest of this mailing list into his disputes? If this is about homosexuality, wouldn't alt.fag.bashing have been a more appropriate forum for his insults. This mailing list is about cryptography and loosely related political issues. It seems that several allegedly gay members of the mailing list have a lot more to contribute on the subject than you or Vulis. Perhaps you somehow disagree, but so what? In either case you must admit that insults based on sexual orientation are not relevant to this mailing list.
The one thing must be said about the Internet is that Faggots are not allowed to have any Authority positions, and this John Gilmore Faggot violates that rule.
They're not? Where did you get that? First of all, what do you define as an Authority position in a completely decentralized network like the internet? Are you talking about being a member of IANA or working for the internic or something? In that case there clearly is no such restriction (in fact, any such restriction would probably result in serious legal problems for the organization that tried to set such policy).
Never trust anybody who does not fuck cunt.
Why not? Is there something obvious I'm missing? What does someone's sexual orientation have to do with his or her trustworthiness? Can you please explain what your point is, and why you need to make it on cypherpunks? I mean if you resent John Gilmore being in a position of authority because for some reason you think he is gay and that bothers you, why use a mailing list he controls to spread that message, as you are giving him control over your communications? I think most of the people on this mailing list don't give a shit about anyone's sexual orientation. You and Vulis have made your point that you think certain members are gay. Apparently most of the remaining members of the list don't believe you and/or don't care. What more are you trying to accomplish? Thanks.
participants (4)
-
aga -
Michael H. Warfield -
nobody＠cypherpunks.ca -
Sven