internet: kenned09@ssw.alcoa.com I am a relatively new member to this list. There is so much potential for great discussion because the topic is technically challenging and politically sensative. That's why it is extremely frustrating to see the list contributors, and it's moderator getting all tied up in their collective underwear over whether or not the moderator can and/or force people to affix a digital signature to every posting. What's worse, they seem to stay up through the night just to bicker about it. In the paper world, I send out many things that I don't sign. I don't sign them because it is of no significance that it be proven that I sent it. It also might be that the information is of such a general nature that it makes no neverminds who sent it. I submit that digital signatures are the same way. But, as Tim May proposed, it could be the "secret-decoder-ring" phenomenon at work. By digitally signing all of our postings we prove that we are committed members of the "cause." But to whom are we proving our dedication. We would be demonstrating it to people who, by nature of their own interest in this list, are already committed. Oh, but wait a minute. Maybe we're afraid that people who don't even own digital signature software, are posting there ideas on our favorite subject. Isn't the posting of any ideas on cryptography by anyone more important than who's doing the posting?