Re: cypherpunks as a newsgroup
At 03:40 PM 9/16/95 -0400, Ian wrote:
I've been very impressed with the signal/noise ratio on this list. In fact, people often put [NOISE] in the subject line to flag trivial content. This ratio will certainly go down if we go to a newsgroup.
I have a group of friends who get forwarded the "best" of the Cypherpunks list. The signal to noise ratio is high enough that I have to be careful how much I forward lest I get complaints at the volume of what I forward. Turning this into an alt group would destroy that.
One of the main benefits of Usenet is that anyone can _post_. One of the main detriments is that _anyone_ can post.
How true. | Visualize whirled keys | alano@teleport.com | |"It's only half a keyserver. I had to split the | Disclaimer: | |other half with the government man." - Black Art | Ignore the man | | -- PGP 2.6.2 key available on request -- | behind the keyboard.| | http://www.teleport.com/~alano | <fnord> |
On Sat, 16 Sep 1995, Alan Olsen wrote:
I have a group of friends who get forwarded the "best" of the Cypherpunks list. The signal to noise ratio is high enough that I have to be careful how much I forward lest I get complaints at the volume of what I forward. Turning this into an alt group would destroy that.
I don't understand this tendency to want to TURN the list into anything. Leave the list, and start an alt.* group if you like. I prefer the list, but will look at the group from time to time. Why must this be an either/or choice? --- "In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti 00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
participants (2)
-
Alan Olsen -
Black Unicorn