Re: the best justice money can buy --Lessig (fwd)
Jim Choate (ravage@ssz.com) wrote:
So do I, and I bet both our incomes combined doesn't add up to 15 minutes of Bill G's and it won't.
Of course not, because Bill has jackbooted copyright enforcers to subsidise his corporation. Without them his income would be dramatically reduced.
From a market perspective we're flies on the back of great elephant. Please be so kind as to describe how and why this marketing mechanism (copyleft) will succed?
Uh, I said copyright should be abolished, you said noone would write software, I said that Linux disproved that claim. How is this relevant to that discussion? Of course it's not going to take over when companies can get billions of dollars of subsidies in the form of copyright enforcement, but it clearly shows that without copyright people will produce better software than Microsfot has ever written.
I've been using and supporting Linux since 1993 (SSZ is listed as a source site in the back of 'Running Linux' since day one) in this manner neither I or anyone else has gotten rich.
Exactly. So tell us how Bill would have become a billionaire without copyright?
It's copyrighted in the important sense in that it uses the copyright to enforce its conditions. That is just as important as the marketing decisions made by it.
All it enforces is source-code distribution (and I've yet to hear of a single case where it's ever been used). That's important to the developers, but not to the average user. The situation would be little changed in a world with no copyright, because if anyone did try to keep their source secret anyone who got a copy could freely distribute it. I'm truly amazed to find all these pro-copyright views on the list, when cypherpunks have been at the forefront of creating technologies to make it unenforceable and obsolete. Mark
[Warning: while this may _look_ like just another rant, there is some technical content below.] At 07:03 AM 2/9/98 -0800, mark@unicorn.com wrote:
Jim Choate (ravage@ssz.com) wrote:
So do I, and I bet both our incomes combined doesn't add up to 15 minutes of Bill G's and it won't.
Of course not, because Bill has jackbooted copyright enforcers to subsidise his corporation. Without them his income would be dramatically reduced. .... Exactly. So tell us how Bill would have become a billionaire without copyright?
Gates got rich not by selling good software, but by selling software very well. Copyright is part of the process, but it's possible to sell your product to computer manufacturers with any customization they need using contracts instead of copyright to make your money. It's also possible to do copy protection in your software; games makers do this because they're widely pirated by non-point-source attacks (kids, mostly) who are hard to track down and sue, unlike major computer manufacturers who are easier to find, both to sue if needed or to provide support for. Copy protection was one of the things people hated about Lotus 123; I don't remember Excel or MS-DOS ever having it. When I've used expensive commercial software on Sun computers, it often needs to be registered with the machine serial number, or used with a floating license server, and refuses to run without it. PCs don't have built-in serial numbers, but they probably would if Gates had insisted on it early enough. Because of copyright law he didn't _have_ to use technical means of copy protection, so the Copyright Enforcers have saved him money - but they've also saved us the aggravation of dealing with copy protection wares. If you _want_ a serial number on each PC for your product, dongles are an available option. They reduce portability somewhat, but software like Banyan Vines networking uses them on its servers. So even the fact that IBM and Mr.Bill didn't install one doesn't stop you from using them - and as anti-crypto law goes away, uncrackable dongles are becoming easier to make (I don't know if anybody bothers, though.) Thanks! Bill Bill Stewart, bill.stewart@pobox.com PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF 3C85 B884 0ABE 4639
participants (2)
-
Bill Stewart -
markļ¼ unicorn.com