Mostly I'd like to know what the proposals by these loft captains of industry ARE. At 06:15 PM 7/12/97 -0700, Tom Weinstein wrote:

Alan wrote:

...

On Fri, 11 Jul 1997, Tim May wrote:

...

At 5:26 PM -0700 7/11/97, Alan Olsen wrote:

...

...

McCain said he met with Microsoft representatives recently to discuss a new technology being developed by the software giant that could be less intrusive and problematic than key recovery. The senator also said he plans to meet with Netscape officials next week to discuss yet another alternative.

This is something we should watch _very_ closely!

I agree. The article seemed to imply that both Microsoft and Netscape were falling all over each other trying to come up with gak-like alternatives to key recovery. I wonder what Tom Weinstien can tell us about that... (He has been a bit quiet lately... Too quiet.)

When I'm quiet, it's probably because I'm busy. It's certainly not because I was spirited off to Fort Meade by the black helicopters for brain washing.

Let's look at this another way. Given the opportunity to discuss your views with a senator, whouldn't you take it? Even if there's very little chance of changing his mind?

We aren't going to suddenly do an about face and start saying that GAK is good. Even if anyone here believed that, there's no way that we'd be able to sell it to our overseas customers.

-- What is appropriate for the master is not appropriate| Tom Weinstein for the novice. You must understand Tao before | tomw@netscape.com transcending structure. -- The Tao of Programming |