re: Speech as co-conspiring? I don't think so.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Tim May wrote:
Since when is broadcasting a radio or television show or writing an essay evidence of complicity in a murder, even when it "pushes someone over the line"?
The producers of the show had better hope that it is not evidence of complicity in a murder. Let's say Tim is crazy.(*) He told us how much he enjoyed seeing the BATF agent take one in the face. If this were to inspire him to try the same thing in real life, how would the producers of the show be less guilty than the talk show host? After all, the most intense and graphic aspect of the episode was the scene where the BATF agent was killed. The people who made the show obviously intended this to have the most impact. It must be the actual point of the show. (It's well known that television watchers are far more responsive to imagery than boring dialogue.) The rest was obviously a cynical attempt to undermine the machinery of justice by appearing to be on the side of law enforcement. Bad People try this trick all the time. Fortunately, the jury usually isn't fooled. I'm looking forward to the miscreants getting the justice they so richly deserve, aren't you? (*) Tim seems too wiley to be crazy. Instead, he seems to be playing The Most Dangerous Game: Fed baiting. Monty Cantsin Editor in Chief Smile Magazine http://www.neoism.org/squares/smile_index.html http://www.neoism.org/squares/cantsin_10.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQEVAwUBNFwn1JaWtjSmRH/5AQEuYwf8DRGHHp1C2uaecJ87tVjE8gSQJNJJUJMA Z0uX+xjse7RSvlcszCZ1/tU0R9IY5iw1uXV9GqDK3JY/mSEKznd994cTo0PfO5PP sgOIJq42ynz9q7eguqsE1I591hhNdhKE1mitPMirvm5Rh2Rwic1veiJMEc3uaHP+ SEiit3LcmqoV9xZ57oxuMRhHr63KQ24HaKDZkSnIIxC6c+8RiJ0pDy94hL15e/GQ O3Yw/M5vZ/CfKYDgQbMzfavbV9QPszgSYg944HinBgWIuo+JbV13eypmLXDw7yxI WlA8Zxt5NNba4sQCe17m0Drxf9e99fX+inIVYKONK3kH2oCF564Hag== =49tL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
At 6:10 AM -0700 11/2/97, Mix wrote:
Tim May wrote:
Since when is broadcasting a radio or television show or writing an essay evidence of complicity in a murder, even when it "pushes someone over the line"?
The producers of the show had better hope that it is not evidence of complicity in a murder.
Let's say Tim is crazy.(*) He told us how much he enjoyed seeing the BATF agent take one in the face. If this were to inspire him to try the same thing in real life, how would the producers of the show be less guilty than the talk show host?
According to the dubious logic of that episode, no doubt they would say they were innocent because they had not _met_ me on any occasions. If, however, the prosecution could produce a witness saying she had seen me in the company of the writer, director, producer, etc., then their bacon would be cooked. By the logic of their episode, of course.
(*) Tim seems too wiley to be crazy. Instead, he seems to be playing The Most Dangerous Game: Fed baiting.
It used to be called "free speech." Nowadays, admitting that one has guns is fed baiting. Admitting that one will defend one's self is fed baiting. Admtting that one has read certain books is fed baiting. And using unbreakable crypto is fed baiting. Ah, what has the world come to? --Tim May The Feds have shown their hand: they want a ban on domestic cryptography ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, ComSec 3DES: 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Higher Power: 2^2,976,221 | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
:: Anon-To: cypherpunks@toad.com Mix wrote:
(*) Tim seems too wiley to be crazy. Instead, he seems to be playing The Most Dangerous Game: Fed baiting. ^^^ (typo)
Could you tell me the best way to kill a policeman, politician, or world leader, without using a gun? Thanks, Fred
participants (3)
-
Fred -
Mix -
Tim May