Are we men or mice? Re: House panel votes behind closed doors to build in Big Brother (fwd)
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 14:27:06 -0400 From: "Shabbir J. Safdar" <shabbir@vtw.org> To: fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu, fight-censorship-announce@vorlorn.mit.edu Subject: Are we men or mice? Re: House panel votes behind closed doors to build in Big Brother At 11:37 PM -0700 9/11/97, Declan McCullagh wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 23:37:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> To: fight-censorship-announce@vorlon.mit.edu .. That's why the encryption outlook in Congress is abysmal. Crypto-advocates have lost, and lost miserably. A month ago, the debate was about export controls. Now the battle is over how strict the //domestic// controls will be. It's sad, really, that so many millions of lobbyist-dollars were not only wasted, but used to advance legislation that has been morphed into a truly awful proposal.
This suggests the battle is over and lost. It's not, and a tone of this sort only plays into the FBI's hands. Feeling like they're on a roll, if the community throws in the towel now, as your tone above suggests, we cede defeat and get domestic restrictions. We have a goddamn right to use encryption without a government backdoor, and I, and nobody else, should give up until it's dragged from our rigor-mortis-addled hands. In Congress, there are still votes left, and we should be fighting to make sure that no member of Congress that has a vote at any point in this process should cast that vote without knowing that their net constituents care about this. They may not always vote with their constituents' wishes (and that is frustrating to all of us) but we certain-as-hell shouldn't let them make that call without having at least constituent input. You want to see effectiveness and change, do something constructive instead of whining on the net. For example, let people know that by signing up for the Adopt Your Legislator program at http://www.crypto..com/member/ they will be notified before and after every vote that their legislator is a party to, complete with phone and fax nnmbers. It may look gloomy now, but bad votes should only make us madder and more determined to lobby Congress. It's easy to complain about the fact that you don't like the direction the boat is going; much harder to devote your energies to actually changing the course. Pick up an oar and row. If you get domestic restrictions on encryption and you haven't been calling your member of Congress on a regular basis to tell them to do the right thing, you'll get exactly the kind of government you've invested in. -S PS I would like this to go to fight-censorship-announce as well, please.
On Fri, 12 Sep 1997, Declan McCullagh wrote:
We have a goddamn right to use encryption without a government backdoor.
Frankly among certain crowds many backdoors and other bugs have been detected in most OS's, how will the mother fuckers keep them from being found and used? I mean, all you have to do is simply get their attention and have them snoop on you, meanwhile you watch all the packets and record the weird ones and you've got a copy of their session. Yeah, they may use crypto on the back door, but even so, you now know their formats, and can also disassemble the code. When you do, you've got the hole and can publish it. Once you publish the hole and break the program. Who will have confidence in that program after it's broken? After the evil laws, our jobs will be to break ALL GAK'ed software. How will they prevent that? Passing more laws to make the exposure of bugs and holes illegal? Sort of like the cell scanner laws? :) =====================================Kaos=Keraunos=Kybernetos============== .+.^.+.| Ray Arachelian |Prying open my 3rd eye. So good to see |./|\. ..\|/..|sunder@sundernet.com|you once again. I thought you were |/\|/\ <--*-->| ------------------ |hiding, and you thought that I had run |\/|\/ ../|\..| "A toast to Odin, |away chasing the tail of dogma. I opened|.\|/. .+.v.+.|God of screwdrivers"|my eye and there we were.... |..... ======================= http://www.sundernet.com ==========================
On Fri, 12 Sep 1997 19:15:15 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 1997, Declan McCullagh wrote:
We have a goddamn right to use encryption without a government backdoor.
Frankly among certain crowds many backdoors and other bugs have been detected in most OS's, how will the mother fuckers keep them from being found and used? I mean, all you have to do is simply get their attention and have them snoop on you, meanwhile you watch all the packets and record the weird ones and you've got a copy of their session. Yeah, they may use crypto on the back door, but even so, you now know their formats, and can also disassemble the code. When you do, you've got the hole and can publish it.
Once you publish the hole and break the program. Who will have confidence in that program after it's broken?
After the evil laws, our jobs will be to break ALL GAK'ed software. How will they prevent that? Passing more laws to make the exposure of bugs and holes illegal? Sort of like the cell scanner laws? :)
They (the government) has already tried to do this by trying to pass laws that would make reverse engineering illegal. I remember reading about a bill in congress earlier this year that would have done just this. I don't know the status of it (I didn't get the bill number). -Doug ------------------- Douglas L. Peterson mailto:fnorky@geocities.com http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Heights/1271/
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: 2.6.2 hIwDWpGd4CskVlEBA/4u/cn7883an7T0PGjWWmtIpAJW9vy3FFWMiua31Pt/kkvM BKNgY+7xwHQlDnr0ytKNEmrNZ2kHq+iCuP69vPNKo7N/mmMVClwFzjdPBN8Rlmp+ ksMQTmDxefKE0yUkcqTFUehgM/om1bkJoso4RdSdDkyvOFZDO8LBl1rcDalJh6YA AAHdHQtMEdaqaW4GQ/SAz6FH15BSyPEX3XLPQrPdLqcDia8LTDkmPEy8hCSOAriC BdxwWb7uynpCwcY5o2X6zskK7wpHSN58JM4iKwYbs8++eIrjaxYi7LPPu342/IVT sLwHPdhMr3njNnvdPOcwePCw2CBVRJLiTSgmFwyn4vV3Hd3LZ99JmAIAFsKSfpmN soK3L++AYJcMY9rXvEmIVSwKvVK1fJAu+k8k+euSsNG1GK/sUvLaWM0wNMlpzTK3 V0zcXhTyEwPnNXjrUDdm2oVisvrGbwSFwTCROZpn4viD/Aj0xcM7x2s6kOEu0SO2 /GhkYCF5cNykC4R/jqgo6vtU9DrDWobCAJ73RFGyP0w4Ba68Ij9CF2CdmCYReYK5 fUu8ceOmD8DQWP/XnCHoWnx2gKJFTc3pACsmBIG5qljM9BRJDp+4H5Mn3BV8z2PR T/Vifdh9Y7i7lc2EYhEAop9Tks0262UERnYven+cDolbzt2QQA1xlVy/X2rAWA9L LUgl6S3qKSh//BP/ZpdhPJGJdu23cu3+kl4zxvf6ztHHfWxAovM9RS/lqyKVOdR6 DCInjUnpImc6Vzz2WPY9yElODHUxVC2DTxM6hzIcBKFj3MqI8QHFcXN59X1+Cnxn =wraS -----END PGP MESSAGE-----
participants (4)
-
Declan McCullagh -
fnorky@geocities.com -
Ray Arachelian -
Toto