Peter Murphy asks for some clarifications. In "DEATH TO STATISTS", I, of course, exclude minarchists from the term "statists". For "DEATH TO STATISTS", I should have substituted "DEATH TO LEFT WING STATISTS" as they are the kind that particularly infuriate me. A PC would not be equivalent to a left wing statist. A PC would have more characteristics that a left wing statist. I have not figured out the exact recipe for such monsters yet. Would "DEATH TO PC'S" violate campus speech codes? Anyway, I think that its important to let them know that we really don't approve of them. They disapprove of so many things & are go aggressive about showing their disapproval & intolerance that I think its only fair. Incidentally, I think that people should be aware of the debt that we owe NEWSWEEK with respect to the "POLITICALLY CORRECT". In their Dec. 24, 1990 issue, NEWSWEEK attacked the politically correct enforcers. It was their "THOUGHT POLICE" issue & it devoted at least 10 pages to their abuses. That issue collectivized the term "POLITICALLY CORRECT". Before that issue, the "POLITICALLY CORRECT" were nameless & nearly invisible monsters. NEWSWEEK gave us a collectivized sneer word that we could attack them with. I don't know why the term "THOUGHT POLICE" didn't catch on big. Sorry to be so late in replying. Yours Truly, Gary Jeffers PUSH EM BACK! PUSH EM BACK! WWWAAAYYY BBBAAACCCKK! BBBEEEAAATTT STATE !