using TCP sequence numbers for stego

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Would using TCP sequence numbers to carry stegoed data be practical? The data would have to be removed at a lower level. This would mean kernel patches and extra system calls in UNIX. I have no idea what this would require under Windows or Mac. This seems like the ideal place to stego data because most OS's have started using random sequence numbers. Any ideas? Mark - -- finger -l for PGP key PGP encrypted mail prefered. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3 Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBMmP7sSzIPc7jvyFpAQHlUQf+JwmltREsYq65f5YPOdubmr8hxAjfiOa+ zIX7VpP75qm+SgiZTxBaioN2pVzW0yCb36IqNKYuZuUww/ip8Bh/0aNnyzNguD+p jXVOLpzbfBeD33Q+NLag6N2R2PogZQT2yx2vfSwQ9zeyoZ1CYTxiKZHDq06czzAt gq3wszp0l9U1jr2xTnmprNYofYUrvWitpId41tTbyx336dmJ5lNKS1Nssu/+vCZC B9Gib+s/ayQz6BGuEDCVqr36cZY75uHYfUuMnIHnONYAsFC4qR1vNdJ/OnCXJJR2 D6Ns9POsb9NGCh0pFzGjDavpQKwIU9b/Br30vge1tKsPA30GByPJMQ== =NaaI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (1)
-
Mark M.