Re: "Got a subpoena?"
On 30 Nov 95 at 12:56, Jay Campbell wrote: : >> "finessing" laws will become more important. In short, they WILL have : >> a subpoena--then what? : > : > Then they'll find out that I don't have any information that : >could help them, anyway. : : What about a court order to (a) start comprehensive logging, and (b) not : tell anyone under penalty of ______ . And at that point, you shut down the remailer and log each and every bounce. Now, they could get an order forcing you to run a remailer ~ but that would open up a whole new can of worms i.e. can you be forced, under court order, to commit a crime? -- JHupp@gensys.com |For PGP Public Key: http://gensys.com |finger jhupp@gensys.com Autocracy is based on the assumption that one man is wiser than a million men. How's that again? I missed something.
On Thu, 30 Nov 1995, Jeff Hupp wrote:
And at that point, you shut down the remailer and log each and every bounce.
Now, they could get an order forcing you to run a remailer ~ but that would open up a whole new can of worms i.e. can you be forced, under court order, to commit a crime?
No. I'm sure someone will come up with an exception, but generally no. You can't be drafted into the FBI. Then there's the 13th amendment argument ... EBD
-- JHupp@gensys.com |For PGP Public Key: http://gensys.com |finger jhupp@gensys.com Autocracy is based on the assumption that one man is wiser than a million men. How's that again? I missed something.
Not a lawyer on the Net, although I play one in real life. ********************************************************** Flame away! I get treated worse in person every day!!
participants (2)
-
Brian Davis -
Jeff Hupp