Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list (fwd)
On Sun, 26 Jan 1997, Dale Thorn wrote:
Actually, it is a certifiable fact that the list subscribers can jump to the unmoderated list whenever they want to. It is also a certifiable fact that they (97% or so) have *not* done so.
Has anyone compiled a summary of the difference of volume of posts to the lists? I'd be interested to find out.
Because of these facts, I must conclude that either:
1. The subscribers have spoken by staying put, or, 2. The subscribers are so lazy and unaware of what's going on that they've just left things as is.
Now, in my opinion, we've come to this: Some people here will hold the optimistic view of the bulk of the subscribers, and others will hold the pessimistic view (the bulk will presumably be in-between).
I just started subscribing to the list near the time it started, so I have not noticed a difference. If the unmoderated list is not much more (~10%) I think I'd prefer the unmoderated list. Regards, Dan Harter dharter@harter.pg.md.us
participants (1)
-
Daniel Harter