Swank's comments on Secure Drive
Punks' Actually Mike Ingle has commented on his position on the distribution of Secure Drive. He asked that it not be placed for anonftp just because of the fact that he doesn't want ot run the same kind of risk that PRZ is currently in... I didn't save a copy of the msg but I'm sure that some one did. FRC -- #include <hdrs/disclaim.std> /* Neural Nets catch only dreaming fish. */
Fred Cooper writes:
Punks' Actually Mike Ingle has commented on his position on the distribution of Secure Drive. He asked that it not be placed for anonftp just because of the fact that he doesn't want ot run the same kind of risk that PRZ is currently in...
I didn't save a copy of the msg but I'm sure that some one did.
Yes, and Phil Zimmermann asked essentially the same thing, though the number of folks aware of these issues was much lower back then....and groups like ours did not even exist then. But when the CryptoNarcs want to go after someone for illegal export of crypto munitions (PGP, SecureDrive, etc.), they are not overly impressed with "wink wink, don't export this, wink, wink" caveats. If Zimmermann gets indicted and if SecureDrive ends up on an offshore ftp site, I expect Mike Ingle will at least get subpoenaed to testify and produce his records, and will possibly be indicted as well. That's the way I see it. --Tim May -- .......................................................................... Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@netcom.com | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero 408-688-5409 | knowledge, reputations, information markets, W.A.S.T.E.: Aptos, CA | black markets, collapse of governments. Higher Power: 2^756839 | Public Key: PGP and MailSafe available. Note: I put time and money into writing this posting. I hope you enjoy it.
participants (2)
-
frc@bwnmr4.bwh.harvard.edu -
tcmay@netcom.com