Anonymous Remailer at DHP.com
In a message dated 97-01-01 18:55:24 EST, lucifer@dhp.com (Anonymous) writes:
Subj: Re: Anonymous Post Control Date: 97-01-01 18:55:24 EST From: lucifer@dhp.com (Anonymous) Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com To: cypherpunks@toad.com
ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson) writes:
It's hard to filter anonymous posters. I want to see what a few of them have to say so I can't filter on the remailers.
If anonymous posters PGP sign their posts, it is still hard to filter using a lame filter software such as that which comes to Eudora.
Anonymous users willing to PGP sign their posts could just use a service like nym.alias.net (mailto:help@nym.alias.net), which even allows pseudonyms to advertise their PGP keys via finger (slightly better than the PGP key servers).
When people post anonymously rather than pseudonymously, it is generally because they don't want a blatant link between all of their posts (though obviously analysis of writing style is still possible).
But why do you always use the anonymous remailer from DHP.com? Why do you not use other places? JIll
----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- From cypherpunks-errors@toad.com Wed Jan 1 18:54:40 1997 Return-Path: cypherpunks-errors@toad.com Received: from toad.com (toad.com [140.174.2.1]) by emin08.mail.aol.com
(8.6.
12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA26357; Wed, 1 Jan 1997 18:54:38 -0500 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA12907 for cypherpunks-outgoing; Wed, 1 Jan 1997 14:25:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from dhp.com (dhp.com [199.245.105.1]) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3)
with ESMTP id OAA12894 for <cypherpunks@toad.com>; Wed, 1 Jan 1997 14:25:06
0800 (PST) Received: (from lucifer@localhost) by dhp.com (8.8.4/8.6.12) id RAA17460 for cypherpunks@toad.com; Wed, 1 Jan 1997 17:25:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Jan 1997 17:25:01 -0500 Message-Id: <199701012225.RAA17460@dhp.com> X-Authentication-Warning: dhp.com: lucifer set sender to lucifer@dhp.com using -f To: cypherpunks@toad.com From: lucifer@dhp.com (Anonymous) Comments: Please report misuse of this automated remailing service to < lucifer@dhp.com>. References: <v02140b0caeef4ce75c72@[192.0.2.1]> Subject: Re: Anonymous Post Control Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com Precedence: bulk
Jill014@aol.com writes:
But why do you always use the anonymous remailer from DHP.com? Why do you not use other places?
Whom are you asking? Personally, I use at least 4 remailers for every message I send. I have a chain of 3 I trust, and have premail automatically select a reliable remailer for the last hop. It may just be that dhp.com has been high on the list lately. So a lot of messages have been coming from there.
participants (2)
-
Jill014＠aol.com -
nobody＠huge.cajones.com