Re: Remailer Operator Liability?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- At 10.18 AM 6/15/96 -0400, Declan B. McCullagh wrote:
Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 15-Jun-96 Re: Remailer Operator Liabi.. by Zed@zeta.org.au
distributed to a minor who was using a nym. I think pressure on anonymous remailers is going to increase as various groups complain that the paw innocent widdle kiddies are "vulnerable to corruption"(or some bullshit like that) because their age can be hidden. Read the decision. The CDA _may_ be
This is true. Yesterday evening I interviewed the director of enforcement for a TLA here in DC. He expressed his concern about anonymous remailers and anonymity online. (More on this later.)
The word here in DC is "accountability."
-Declan
Am I the only one who thinks that any kid who is competent enough and smart enough to use a nym will not only 1) not be warped or corrupted by the horrible porno demons but also 2) won't even care about porno? =============================================================================== David Rosoff (nihongo o chiisaku dekimasu) -------------> drosoff@arc.unm.edu For PGP key 0xD37692F9, finger drosoff@acoma.arc.unm.edu or get from keyservers pub 1024/D37692F9 1995/07/01 David Rosoff <drosoff@arc.unm.edu> Key fingerprint = 25 7D AA 01 85 41 43 89 50 5A 33 76 F1 F1 99 67 I accept anonymous mail. If I didn't sign it, you don't know I wrote it. === "Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will / To strive, to seek, to find-- and not to yield." <---- "Ulysses", by Alfred, Lord Tennyson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMcMI4xguzHDTdpL5AQHSUQQAo0YJvapyiC5r2eoY5BDaEEf164zxE+ub JUw807Ovtsg0SSoyESHOAyO4S8usq4dV8JVJRlmGitAo+p9BJPWe8UYX8u4LU9se LZoCOkgwomRLdLL4D4/3ALaT/qanTpuJ/NelxGN7871+jSA6qiuL8nSLdTiU3zL8 YHaWo7z1nNI= =m9F9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (1)
-
David Rosoff